Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:49

Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Exactly When Apple Will Launch iPhone 17 And iPhone 17 Pro - Forbes
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
After 600 Years, Astronomers Finally Solve the Mystery of the Missing ‘Guest Star’ - Gizmodo
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Grandfather's simple changes reversed pre-diabetes diagnosis that left him 'petrified' - AOL.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Woman on trial for poison mushroom killings says she was trying to fix "bland" meal - CBS News
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
The Apple AirPods Pro and AirPods 4 Drop to the Lowest Prices of the Year for Father's Day - IGN
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.